FACT Sheet: A Brief Summary of The Corporate Transparency Act (Title LXIV of the NDAA, H.R. 6395)

Download as PDF



Negotiated by Senate Banking Chairman Mike Crapo (R-ID), RM Sherrod Brown (D-OH); House Financial Services Chairwoman Waters (D-CA), RM Member Patrick McHenry (R-NC); and the original lead, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY). 


The House passed its version of this reform — the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) — in late 2019 in a vote of 249 to 173. The Trump Administration sent a notice of support the same day as the vote.

Building on the work of their colleagues — a bill initially led by Sens. Mark Warner (D-VA) and Tom Cotton (R-AR) with evenly bipartisan cosponsors — Banking Chairman Crapo (R-ID) and RM Brown (D-OH) negotiated for several months, made additional edits and business-friendly changes, and filed the Anti-Money Laundering Act as an amendment to the FY21 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The bill has the support of both President Trump and President-Elect Biden. 

Due to procedural issues, the AML Act was not ultimately included in the Senate defense bill, but the CTA was added to the House defense bill. After four months of negotiation to harmonize the language and add the bill to the final NDAA conference report, the Corporate Transparency Act will be voted on and sent to the President’s desk in December 2020.


Anonymous companies are the vehicle of choice for the criminal and the corrupt to launder illicit funds with impunity. Drug cartels, human trafficking rings, purveyors of counterfeit and pirated goods, rogue nations evading sanctions, corrupt officials stealing from state coffers, and others use anonymous corporate structures to move and hide illicit wealth. 

What Does It Do?

The Corporate Transparency Act takes the simple, yet effective step to require corporations and limited liability companies (LLCs) to disclose to law enforcement and others with legally mandated anti-money laundering responsibilities (e.g. financial institutions) information on who is the real, natural person (a.k.a. beneficial owner) who owns and controls an entity at the point of formation and update such information upon any change.

Who Supports It?

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, national security experts, police, sheriffs, local prosecutors, state Attorneys General, federal prosecutors, human rights advocates, anti-human trafficking groups, faith-based networks, international development NGOs, several CEOs and businesses, banks, credit unions, real estate professionals, insurance companies, over 125 non-governmental organizations, and scholars at both conservative and liberal think tanks, among others.

The Details

What Information Is Required?

Just four pieces of readily available information — a name, address, date of birth, and driver’s license or other identification number. No financial information or details about business purpose or operation is required.

Where Is the Information Stored, and Who Has Access to It?

Information would be reported to the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). FinCEN is our nation’s financial intelligence unit with the responsibility of housing and reviewing data to protect our financial system from abuse by terrorist networks and other criminals who seek access to our markets and our economy.

Federal, state, local and tribal law enforcement would have access to the information for use in authorized investigations as would financial institutions (with customer consent) that have legally mandated anti-money laundering obligations.

What About Reporting Changes in Ownership?

The Corporate Transparency Act requires updated reporting if and only when there is a change in ownership.    

Are All Companies Required to File?

There are exemptions for certain entities that file redundant reports with other agencies (e.g. publicly traded firms file relevant information with the SEC), or that are lower risk (e.g. larger private companies with real operations in the U.S.).

What Are the Penalties for Violating the Law?

There are civil and criminal penalties, including fines of up to $10,000 and up to two years in prison for willful violations. Negligence (e.g. honest paperwork violations) is not punishable under the bill.

Is It Workable?

Yes. The U.S. Department of Defense and the Department of the Treasury both have programs in which they are collecting beneficial ownership information for certain higher risk real estate transactions without incident.

The U.K. has a beneficial ownership directory. Analysis has shown that compliance has cost businesses an average of just £2 (~$2.50) a year. Another study found that the average number of owners per business in the U.K. is 1.13.  Per the U.S. Small Business Administration, approximately 78 percent of all businesses in the U.S. are non-employer firms, meaning there is only one person in the enterprise. This suggests that the U.S. experience would track that of the U.K.

Will It Make a Difference?

The early evidence, where transparency is in place, suggests it will have a significant impact.

  • An early analysis of FinCEN’s efforts to collect ownership information in certain real estate transactions found that, “…about 30 percent of reported transactions involve a beneficial owner or purchaser representative that was also the subject of a previous suspicious activity report.”
  • A NY Federal Reserve study of FinCEN’s program found, “After anonymity is no longer freely available to domestic and foreign investors, all-cash purchases by corporations fall by approximately 70 percent, indicating the share of anonymity-seeking investors using LLCs as ‘shell corporations.’”
  • An analysis of the U.K. directory found robust law enforcement use of the information.

For additional information, contact Erica Hanichak at