The Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency Coalition (FACT Coalition) sent a letter to House lawmakers Tuesday urging them to oppose H.R. 2054/S. 869 and defend the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). The full letter can be read below or downloaded here.
April 25, 2017
Member of Congress
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
RE: Oppose H.R. 2054/S. 869; Protect the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA)
Dear Member of Congress,
We write on behalf of the Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency Coalition (FACT Coalition) to urge you to oppose H.R. 2054/S. 869. The purpose of this bill is to repeal the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), an important tool to combat tax evasion by wealthy individuals who fail to report to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) income related to foreign accounts, as has long been required by U.S. law.
The FACT Coalition is a non-partisan alliance of more than 100 state, national, and international organizations working toward a fair tax system that addresses the challenges of a global economy and promoting policies to combat the harmful impacts of corrupt financial practices.
The 2010 law requires foreign banks and other foreign financial institutions holding U.S. client accounts to report certain information about those accounts to the IRS. This is information that those accountholders should already have been reporting but often were not, as shown by a series of offshore tax evasion cases over the years. For example, prior to passage, Switzerland’s largest bank, UBS, paid a $780 million penalty and pled guilty to helping tens of thousands of U.S. clients (who did not disclose their accounts as required by U.S. law) evade U.S. taxes. UBS opened Swiss accounts for these clients without disclosing the accounts to the IRS, as was required under UBS’s Qualified Intermediary agreement with the U.S. To combat that type of misuse of foreign accounts, FATCA created transparency measures that parallel the transparency measures that have long applied to U.S. taxpayers with domestic accounts.
Every year, your employer, your bank, the Social Security Administration, and anyone holding or investing your savings sends you and the IRS information about your accounts. This long-standing U.S. enforcement process combines patriotism and accountability to create a culture of tax compliance. This sensible approach has allowed us to pay for national priorities such as defense, education, and infrastructure. It is a necessary practice that ensures everyone is playing by the rules.
According to the IRS, tax compliance in the U.S. is upwards of 80%. Many experts attribute that high rate, in part, to third party reporting requirements that ensure information is shared about taxpayer assets and income. In contrast, the lack of tax compliance is often cited as one of the leading causes of financial woes in economically struggling nations. We are, as a country, engaged in a robust debate around tax rates, exemptions and structures, but few would argue that a goal of tax reform should be to make it easier to illegally evade taxes. And yet, repealing FATCA would do just that.
FATCA does not impose any new tax on any individual, here or abroad. Put simply, with or without FATCA, U.S. taxpayers with money in foreign banks would still owe taxes — and many were required to disclose their accounts long before FATCA was adopted. The only difference would be that, if FATCA were repealed, foreign accountholders would be at far less risk of being caught.
FATCA disclosures apply only to wealthier individuals. Additional individual reporting requirements apply only to foreign accounts holding more than $50,000 for individuals and $100,000 for joint-filing U.S. residents holding offshore accounts. For those living abroad, the thresholds are more than $200,000 for individuals and $400,000 for couples. For the foreign banks, the reporting requirements are for accounts with more than $50,000.
FATCA also levels the playing field between U.S. and foreign financial institutions. For years, U.S. financial institutions complied with legal requirements to report account information for U.S. taxpayers to the IRS, while foreign financial institutions did not. Law-abiding U.S. banks were forced to compete against foreign banks that allowed wealthy U.S. clients to open foreign accounts without disclosing them to the IRS. FATCA ended that unfair competition by imposing a meaningful penalty on foreign financial institutions that failed to disclose their U.S. client accounts. Repealing FATCA would reinstate not only the foreign bank secrecy that disadvantaged U.S. banks, but also the secrecy incentives that encouraged wealthy U.S. individuals to move their money and assets offshore.
Opponents of FATCA have sometimes raised concerns regarding the costs of FATCA compliance. In fact, those costs are borne by foreign banks and put them on par with U.S. banks that already bear the same reporting responsibilities and costs. In a letter to Congressional leadership, groups opposed to FATCA wrote that “the global economy would come to a grinding halt” if FATCA-style reporting were adopted more widely. However, FATCA-style standards are already being put in place by 100 other countries that, just like the United States, seek to crack down on tax evasion through foreign bank accounts. The new laws are kicking in this year with those countries unconcerned about any ill effect on the global economy. FATCA-style information exchange is quickly becoming the global norm.
The initial costs to establish new systems to automate FATCA reporting requirements have already been spent and cannot be avoided since, even if FATCA were repealed, foreign banks would still have to comply with the information exchange laws in other countries. The cost savings argument was never about U.S. banks and, now, is less relevant for foreign banks.
Tax evasion is a serious crime, and the victims are honest taxpayers. Economists estimate that offshore tax evasion by wealthy U.S. individuals robs the U.S. Treasury of between $35 billion and $70 billion each year. As we engage in a broader tax reform debate, we should be focused on closing loopholes and tightening anti-evasion measures, not loosening them.
H.R. 2054/S. 869 takes us in the wrong direction, and we strongly urge you to oppose the bill. We appreciate your consideration of our views. For additional information, please feel free to contact Clark Gascoigne at [email protected]
The FACT Coalition
The FACT Coalition
- For a full list of FACT members, see: https://thefactcoalition.org/about/coalition-members-and-supporters/
- “UBS Enters into Deferred Prosecution Agreement”. U.S. Department of Justice. February 18, 2009 (accessible at https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ubs-enters-deferred-prosecution-agreement).
- “The Tax Gap: Tax Gap Estimates for Tax Years 2008-2010”. Internal Revenue Service. April 4, 2017 (accessible at https://www.irs.gov/uac/the-tax-gap).
- Slemrod, Joel. “Tax Compliance and Enforcement: New Research and Its Policy Implications (Working Draft)”. University of Michigan. January 16, 2016 (accessible at http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/jslemrod/Tax_Compliance_New_Research_012016.pdf).
- “Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR)”. Internal Revenue Service. February 27, 2017 (accessible at https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/report-of-foreign-bank-and-financial-accounts-fbar) .
- “Summary of FATCA Reporting for U.S. Taxpayers”. Internal Revenue Service. November 7, 2016 (accessible at https://www.irs.gov/businesses/corporations/summary-of-fatca-reporting-for-u-s-taxpayers).
- “Coalition of 23 Groups to Congress: Include FATCA Repeal in Tax Reform”. Center for Freedom and Prosperity. March 21, 2017 (accessible at http://freedomandprosperity.org/files/2017-FATCA_repeal_coalition_ltr.pdf).
- “AEOI: STATUS OF COMMITMENTS (100 jurisdictions have committed)”. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. April 10, 2017 (accessible at https://www.oecd.org/tax/transparency/AEOI-commitments.pdf).
- Zucman, Gabriel. “The Hidden Wealth of Nations: The Scourge of Tax Havens”. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, September 22, 2015 (accessible at http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/H/bo20159822.html).
- Guttentag, Joseph, and Reuven Avi-Yonah. “Closing the International Tax Gap.” In Bridging the Tax Gap: Addressing the Crisis in Federal Tax Administration, edited by M. B. Sawicky, 99-110. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute, 2006.
About the FACT Coalition
The Financial Accountability and Corporate Transparency (FACT) Coalition is a non-partisan alliance of more than 100 state, national, and international organizations working toward a fair tax system that addresses the challenges of a global economy and promoting policies to combat the harmful impacts of corrupt financial practices.
1225 Eye St. NW, Suite 600 | Washington, DC | 20005 | USA
+1 (202) 827-6401 | @FACTCoalition | www.thefactcoalition.org